Coming soon, I hope…
Field Notes: Podcast Movement 2016
01 Monday Aug 2016
Posted in Uncategorized
01 Monday Aug 2016
Posted in Uncategorized
Coming soon, I hope…
10 Tuesday May 2016
Posted in Uncategorized
-A mini-post for time-starved individuals
In this upside-down political season and boiling morass of religious and atheistic claims, how are we to judge or evaluate the merits and demerits of a religious, political, or even an academic system of claims or beliefs?
Judge? Yes, judge. We are to “first remove the log from our own eye, so we see clearly…”
Back to the original question. How are we to judge value systems?
There are many ways to evaluate the truthfulness of a system of thought:
But I want to alert you to one more:
4. The treatment of dissenters.
Ask yourself,
“How does this political system, religious system, or academic discipline treat those with opposing views?”
This will tell you a lot about the internal confidence of the adherents of this belief system. Do they have confidence in their system and confidence in YOU to be able to hear their reasons and respond with respect to their arguments?
Or do they berate you for asking questions? Do they threaten you with punishment? Do they call you names?
Important caveat! Rude adherents do not negate the truthfulness of a system of thought, and calm adherents do not prove a system to be true. But one can only have a discussion about items 1-3 above with someone who is confident enough to calmly dialog about their beliefs.
I am struck by Jesus instructions to his students (disciples) in Luke 10.
When you enter any town, and they don’t welcome you, go out into its streets and say, ‘We are wiping off as a witness against you even the dust of your town that clings to our feet. Know this for certain: The kingdom of God has come near.’ [Luke 10:10-11 HCSB]
Notice that it is up to God to deal with dissent, not us. They were not told to burn down the town, to call the town names, to publish a list of towns to boycott, etc.
For our battle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the world powers of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavens. [Ephesians 6:12 HCSB]
We are to speak the truth with gentleness and respect, living a life that is above reproach, and suffering for doing good if that is the outcome.
And who will harm you if you are deeply committed to what is good? But even if you should suffer for righteousness, you are blessed. Do not fear what they fear or be disturbed, but honor the Messiah as Lord in your hearts.
Always be ready to give a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you. However, do this with gentleness and respect, keeping your conscience clear, so that when you are accused, those who denounce your Christian life will be put to shame.
For it is better to suffer for doing good, if that should be God’s will, than for doing evil. [1 Peter 3:13-17 HCSB]
Wow. Compare the Biblical response to dissenting views with those on the political left, the social left, the climate machine, the in-your-face right, the radical Islamists, the nationalists and non-nationalists in Germany, the anarchist protestors, BLM, BDS, SJWs, and on and on.
Are they able to make the case for their beliefs using 1, 2, and 3 above? Or do they tell you to “shut up and get in line”?
When the church has said, “shut up and get in line”, it has harmed the witness of Christ. When it has given a defense with gentleness and respect, it has advanced.
Check yourself. Learn to make a case for your views and resist the urge to belittle your opposition. Argue the facts. Focus on reality not feelings or fantasy. And with God’s help, be good.
05 Tuesday Apr 2016
Posted in Biography, Campus Apologetics, Church, Ratio Christi
As Director of Ratio Christi at SHSU, I am always collecting “tough questions”. I want to be sure I am addressing the deepest questions that are percolating below the surface of the students’ calm and cool demeanor.
I also challenge the students to be ready to answer the First Question – “What do you believe and why do you believe it?” So I thought I would put down my answer to this question in blog post form, for them and for you.
A: I’ll answer this in two parts since it is a two part question.
This question is easy to answer in some respects, because it is one that has been at the heart of the church for 2000 years. Since the beginning of the church at Pentecost (Acts 2), the Apostles began spreading the Gospel in Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria, and the world.
The early Christian Creeds were succinct statements of the Gospel. Take one of the earliest creedal statements as an example,
“For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received,
I have written it in outline form, which is a useful practice when it comes to creeds. This statement is both an eyewitness report that Jesus bodily rose from the dead, and a theological statement that he died for our sins as predicted by the scriptures (Isaiah 53; Watch this amazing dialog about Isaiah 53 in Israel ).
The creeds grew from very simple to quite elaborate as the Church wrestled with finer theological points. But there is broad agreement that the Apostles’ Creed captures the foundational essentials of orthodox Christianity. To deviate from them is to deviate from Christianity. (In this usage orthodox is to mean authentic, not Eastern Orthodox, etc.)
Notice how most of the Creed is centered on our physical and temporal experience of “God with us” which is Isaiah’s prophesied name of the Messiah (Isaiah 7:14 and Matthew 1:23). Many of these claims are evidential, observable, and testable (at least at the time). Others are theological. All of these claims are Biblical. In fact, there is an EXTENSIVE Bible study on the Apostles Creed here.
And J. Warner Wallace has a nice blog post on early Christian creeds and confessions of faith.
So as a Christian, my simple answer to “What do you believe?” is given to me and to you in the Apostles’ Creed.
The “Why do you believe it?” question is subjective and personal. But this is where the conversation gets interesting, especially if we want to discuss our beliefs with others (i.e. evangelism).
Why would I believe some of the outlandish things put forth in the Apostles’ Creed?
My answer has changed over the years, but it has grown stronger, and I think, more compelling. Here is a timeline:
1968 – 73: Infancy and early childhood, I would have no answer to the “why” question, except “my family goes to church”, or “Jesus loves me, this I know, for the Bible tells me so.” from the familiar hymn.
1974 – 80: Through the Sunday school program at St. Andrew’s Episcopal Church in Fort Worth, TX, I began reading the Bible on my own time, as this was encouraged by my excellent Sunday School teachers. My answer at that time for “why do you believe it?” would have been “because it is in the Bible”.
This is a good answer, by the way. But it requires a second layer of defense, namely an answer to the question, “Why do you believe the Bible is reliable?”
1981 – 92: Through high school and my bachelor’s degree at UT Austin, my faith became more experiential. Emotionally moving worship experiences in both liturgical settings and contemporary settings helped me feel a connection to God. Summer camps, the Baptist student ministry, Chi Alpha at UT, FCA, Longhorn Band Bible study, and ski trips created close knit connections to the Church – the body of believers and the body of Christ on Earth.
My answer for “why do you believe it?” was as warranted as any other belief about a real person. I believed in God because I had “met Him” – in prayer, in worship, in service, in fellowship, and in the church.
This is also a good answer. It is internal confirmation of the Apostles’ Creed articles about the “Holy Spirit” and the “church”. It cannot be easily argued against, because it is experiential.
But it is not very compelling to some because it is experiential. They may not believe that my experience is an indicator of reality about God. I could be deceived or even acculturated to create these feelings in myself to fit into my chosen group – the church.
1993 – present: As a graduate student in Oregon – a very secular part of the country – I was able to see Christianity from “the outside” through the eyes of non-Christians who I met in the billion or so coffee shops and microbreweries in the Northwest. They were happy to let me have my subjective experiential Christian faith. But they were not convinced.
I began to read more Christian apologetics and found a treasure trove of books about and by atheists who became Christians. (For example, my Ratio Christi colleague Joel Furches has blogged about many atheist converts to Christianity, and it was apparently EASY for him to find examples.)
Many of these atheists sought to make an objective and evidential case against Christianity, because they had only heard subjective and emotional arguments like mine such as: – “Christianity is a relationship. Christianity works for me. If you ask me how I know He lives, He lives… within… my heart. (as the hymn goes)”.
I was energized to learn from these converts to Christianity. Their evidential approach convinced them that the Christian truth claims were actually True. I did my best to look at their arguments with “outside eyes”, and I continue to find their arguments compelling.
You may accuse me of confirmation bias, but making an accusation is not the same as making an argument.
Therefore, at the present time, here is my answer to “Why do you believe it?”
The evidence for this comes from astrophysics and cosmology. It essentially gives evidence for the first article of the Apostles’ Creed “God almighty creator of heaven and earth”.
The claims about him only make sense if he supernaturally rose from the dead. Many of these facts are confirmed using sources outside the Bible. Consider this research using ONLY non-Christian sources done by J. Warner Wallace – an atheist homicide detective who became a Christian after his research.
“Let’s review what we’ve learned from hostile pagan and Jewish sources describing Jesus. We’ll do our best to discount the anti-Christian bias we see in the sources, just as we discounted the pro-Christian bias we think might exist in some versions of the writing of Josephus. Many elements of the Biblical record are confirmed by these hostile accounts, in spite of the fact they deny the supernatural power of Jesus:
Jesus was born and lived in Palestine. He was born, supposedly, to a virgin and had an earthly father who was a carpenter. He was a teacher who taught that through repentance and belief, all followers would become brothers and sisters. He led the Jews away from their beliefs. He was a wise man who claimed to be God and the Messiah. He had unusual magical powers and performed miraculous deeds. He healed the lame. He accurately predicted the future. He was persecuted by the Jews for what He said, betrayed by Judah Iskarioto. He was beaten with rods, forced to drink vinegar and wear a crown of thorns. He was crucified on the eve of the Passover and this crucifixion occurred under the direction of Pontius Pilate, during the time of Tiberius. On the day of His crucifixion, the sky grew dark and there was an earthquake. Afterward, He was buried in a tomb and the tomb was later found to be empty. He appeared to His disciples resurrected from the grave and showed them His wounds. These disciples then told others Jesus was resurrected and ascended into heaven. Jesus’ disciples and followers upheld a high moral code. One of them was named Matthai. The disciples were also persecuted for their faith but were martyred without changing their claims. They met regularly to worship Jesus, even after His death.
Not bad, given this information is coming from ancient accounts hostile to the Biblical record. While these non-Christian sources interpret the claims of Christianity differently, they affirm the initial, evidential claims of the Biblical authors (much like those who interpret the evidence related to Kennedy’s assassination and the Twin Tower attacks come to different conclusions but affirm the basic facts of the historical events). Is there any evidence for Jesus outside the Bible? Yes, and the ancient non-Christian interpretations (and critical commentaries) of the Gospel accounts serve to strengthen the core claims of the New Testament.” –JWW
So without even using the Bible, we could confirm the main points of the second article of the Apostles’ Creed.
This is the center pole of the tent of Christianity. If Jesus is who he claims to be, then we get ALL OF SCRIPTURE in the mix. He quotes the Old Testament. The reason why he came is prophesied in the Old Testament.
These prophesies MUST BE FALSE if there is no God, and only nature exists. But if Jesus rose SUPERNATURALLY from the dead, then there is a supernatural realm, and the Bible becomes the best source for learning about God, the Holy Spirit, and all the other theological points – not because we like it, but because archaeology affirms the Biblical accounts over and over again.
This syllogism is invincible. In fact, one can find atheists who support a. and deny b. And one can find atheists who support b. and deny a. One rarely finds an atheist who supports both a. and b. because that would make them a theist, or an internally conflicted atheist who ignores his own cognitive dissonance. (This is not much of a slight, though. We all tend to suppress cognitive dissonance. Hopefully, this post is causing some positive cognitive dissonance, for you.)
This moral framework is evidence for portions of the Apostles’ Creed as well – “at the right hand of the Father” (authority), “judge the living and the dead” (moral law breakers), “forgiveness of sins” (reconciliation with God), “everlasting life” (eternal reconciliation with God).
What do you believe? – The Apostles’ Creed is a concise statement of my Christian convictions. I also accept the Nicene Creed, the Athanasian Creed, and the Augsburg Confession, and I am a member of Faith Lutheran Church LCMS in Huntsville, Texas.
Why do you believe it? – It is the best evidential description of reality – the way the world ACTUALLY is.
Bonus question,
Wow! This means God REALLY loves me and YOU. We have been in rebellion against him through our self-centered desires. This rebellion will eventually lead to our permanent rejection of all Godly things – the antithesis of love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. But God himself took the punishment we deserved, thus healing the sickness of sin that brings death. All we must do is consider the claims of the Apostles’ Creed – that through Jesus’ death and resurrection, our dead bodies can be made newly alive. If we accept the cure that he provides, we will live.
If you don’t believe it, yet, that’s understandable. But chew on it.
Don’t ignore your questions. Ignoring spiritual questions is worse than ignoring chest pain.

By Nheyob – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0
Tempus fugit.
Darren
31 Thursday Mar 2016
Posted in Campus Apologetics

As we sound the alarm in our congregations, think of what the youth are thinking.
This research revealed that many of the 70% merely take a hiatus from regular church attendance during the college years. There are many factors which drive this. Some of which are good, not bad.
For instance, many students are very active in para-church ministries, which technically are not church, and would not be seen as regular church attendance. I have been involved with these students and these ministries for years at multiple campuses. The spiritual needs of these students are being met with regular worship, small group Bible study, discipleship groups, service projects, and Christian outreach. These students go on to more stable lives and return to church when jobs, marriages, and kids come along.
That is NOT to say that there is no exodus. There is. But it is not 70%.
Ratio Christi College Prep (RCCP) exists to train mentor youth leaders to run high school apologetics clubs within the church or school. The purpose of these clubs is to:
Contact me to set up a training in your area. I’ll put you in contact with the RCCP Coordinator.
We are hosting a High School Retreat to:
Your youth will meet college mentors from SHSU who have NOT lost their faith in college. Instead, these college students have grown closer to the Lord through Bible study and through the study of Christian Apologetics – the Rational Defense of the Faith.
That’s what Ratio Christi is all about.
I sincerely hope you will support us by telling the youth in YOUR church to attend our High School Retreat on April 16, 2016.
All they have to do to sign up is text “@16retreat” to 81010.
The High School Retreat landing page is here.
God bless you and your youth.
-Darren

24 Thursday Mar 2016
Posted in Uncategorized

This is the mandate from Mandate (Maundy) Thursday.
“I give you a new command: Love one another. Just as I have loved you, you must also love one another.” [John 13:34 HCSB]
Tonight is the celebration of Jesus’ Last Supper with his students. Tomorrow night is the Good Friday service where the recitation of his arrest, trial, flogging, mocking, and crucifixion will occur as candles are extinguished allowing darkness to fill the room.
Find a church to experience this service if you have never been – especially if you are a college student away from home and seeking community in your college town. If you are near Huntsville, TX, then join us at Faith Lutheran Church at 6:30 PM, Friday, March 25, 2016.
Nothing will bond you to other individuals more than attending a funeral with them. Tomorrow night is Jesus’ funeral for lack of a better term.
A funeral is required if there is to be a resurrection. There is no empty tomb without a full tomb.
What is Holy Week all about? I know of no better answer than Hymn 430 in the LSB.
1 My song is love unknown, my Savior’s love to me,
Love to the loveless shown that they might lovely be.
O who am I
That for my sake
My Lord should take
Frail flesh, and die?
2 He came from His blest throne salvation to bestow;
But men made strange, and none the longed-for Christ would know.
But, oh, my friend,
My Friend indeed,
Who at my need
His life did spend!
3 Sometimes they strew His way, and His sweet praises sing;
Resounding all the day hosannas to their King.
Then “Crucify!”
Is all their breath,
And for His death
They thirst and cry.
4 Why, what hath my Lord done? What makes this rage and spite?
He made the lame to run, he gave the blind their sight.
Sweet injuries!
Yet they at these
Themselves displease
And ‘gainst Him rise.
5 They rise and needs will have my dear Lord made away;
A murderer they save, the Prince of Life they slay.
Yet steadfast He
To suff’ring goes,
That He His foes
From thence might free.
6 In life no house, no home my Lord on earth might have;
In death no friendly tomb but what a stranger gave.
What my I say?
Heav’n was His home
But mine the tomb
Wherein He lay.
7 Here might I stay and sing, no story so divine!
Never was love, dear King, never was grief like Thine.
This is my Friend,
In whose sweet praise
I all my days
Could gladly spend!
Amen,
-Darren
05 Wednesday Aug 2015
Posted in Biography, C.S. Lewis, Literature, Podcasts
I encourage you to feast upon this collection of interview podcasts from the Eric Mataxas Show. Eric Mataxas is author of Amazing Grace, Bonhoeffer, and Miracles. Eric also created Socrates in the City, which is the venue for these interviews that took place in Oxford, England.
The interviews were of Walter Hooper – C. S. Lewis’s personal secretary and manager of Lewis’s papers after his death. He shares some fascinating stories about our favorite mentor in the faith.
Please enjoy, and go subscribe to the Eric Mataxas Show for more of the same. (No commission is involved, unfortunately. 🙂 )
Hour 1
Hour 2
Hour 3
Hour 4
I cannot add much. Some of my favorite moments in these interviews made me laugh and a few made me choke up with a tear or two.
I laughed when Walter cautioned Jack about giving money to a beggar outside the pub.
Hooper: “Aren’t you afraid that this man will spend that money on drink?”
Lewis: “Well if I kept it, I would.”
A tear welled up when I heard the Pope’s compliment of Lewis.
He knew his Apostolate; and he DID it.
It surprised me that I reacted this way. But this is a hint of what we hope to hear from God in the end,
Well done, my good and faithful servant.
May we all find our apostolate and DO it with God’s help.
DLW
13 Friday Feb 2015
Posted in Uncategorized
I spoke at CRU at SHSU’s meeting last Wednesday, and had a great time. Afterward, Shaneil came up to me and asked me what apologetics resources I would recommend. She followed up with an email so that I could put some thought to my answer.
Instead of merely answering this in an email to one person, I thought this would make an easy and broadly applicable blog post. So here goes…
I hope this list has provided you with some new resources. Let me know in the comments section if you use some of the same, or if you have some different suggestions.
-Darren Williams
18 Thursday Sep 2014
Posted in Uncategorized
What’s the right answer? Every student worth their salt at some point asks this question when making lab measurements. Often in the teaching labs we engineer the results by giving them an “unknown” to analyze. But the professor has the certificate of analysis from the company that sold the unknowns.
But how do we come to have confidence in this certificate of analysis? Sometimes the certificate has the designation of “NIST Traceable“, which for chemical analysis is something of a gold standard. What goes into this confidence?
Traceability relies on several things – library standards, trained personnel, and calibrated instrumentation. Each of these criteria have their own rigorous vetting process, because nature does not ever explicitly tell you the right answer. In the end, self-consistency is in play. This process serves as canon, rule, or law for chemical analyses.
There are chemists who spend their careers improving this traceability vetting process, and some of my own research has been dedicated to creating physical standard reference objects for calibrating contact angle measurement devices and instrumentation.
Interestingly, I see the same process at work in analyzing the canon, rule, and law of the Bible. There is a great iPad app from Doug Powell on the traceability of the New Testament. This post image is from that app from selflessdefense.com.
In this app Doug lays out the criteria used by the church to recognize traceability. They are:
This seems to be a reasonable approach, but it is not without controversy. Dan Brown (in fictional Da Vinci code) and others (like Bart Ehrman) have claimed that the Canon was created as a power play of Constantine or that the deity of Jesus was a late invention. But even a tip-toe into the historical record falsifies these claims.
For more detail, I highly recommend Doug’s apps and books. A second and more forensic treatment of this topic is given in J. Warner Wallace’s book Cold Case Christianity in the chapter where he discusses the Chain of Custody of the story of Jesus of Nazareth.
I hope you will dig into these resources. It is my birthday, today, and I give this gift to you. Don’t leave it unopened.
DLW
26 Tuesday Aug 2014
Posted in Uncategorized
As the twig is bent, so grows the tree. Beginnings are important. Therefore it is important to me how I begin this new blog site.
I am a chemist by training and passion. I spend my life’s work making decisions on phenomena I cannot see. But the results and predicted behaviors of nature are breathtaking in their intricacy and beauty. Of course beauty is in the eye of the beholder when looking at a calibration line with an R-squared of “five nines”!
I have enjoyed 17 years of smelling the “five nines” roses in academia and industry. Academia is almost magical in its appreciation for knowledge and learning in each specialized discipline. And industry is thrilling in its insistence on mixing disciplines to achieve a goal. I truly LOVE both.
I am sure industry is where I gained my appreciation of what other disciplines bring to the table when searching for a solution, an answer, or the truth of the matter. So let me get to the meat of the post.
I recently attended a lecture by Dr. Richard Howe. Where he posted a very nice graphic. It serves as a nice tree of thought that supports our various disciplines.
Starting at the top of the tree (so that it is right side up on the page), we have:
Hermeneutics – How do we understand what is communicated about what we know of that which is.
Linguistics – How do we communicate what we know of that which is?
Epistemology – How do we know that which is?
Metaphysics – What is that which is?
Reality – That which is.
All our varied disciplines attach themselves to this Philosophical tree including Science, and including Theology.
My industrial training commands me to use the appropriate discipline for the appropriate question. Science rests upon the Epistemological branch, but when a philosophical question arises, we scientists should boldly bring Philosophers to the table, demanding that they be as competent and careful as we are when doing science. Likewise if a question arises that crosses the line into the study of God, then we should be bold to see what Theologians have to say, demanding that they be as competent and careful as we are when doing science.
To demand that a particular discipline is the only connection to “that which is” belies an unthoughtfull approach. With respect to the above tree of thought, that claim is really “out on a limb”!
Your comments, suggestions, and subscriptions are welcome!
:DW
25 Monday Aug 2014
Posted in Uncategorized
This site is 10 minutes old and counting. As is the case with newborns, most of the beauty is in the eyes of the parents, family and friends. To everyone else, it is just another baby.
However, this site’s content will be cross-posted on the Sam Houston State University’s Ratio Christi Chapter Blog. Head over there for a sampling of content that will show up here soon.
WordPress sites get more traffic, have excellent analytics, and provide outstanding comment moderation tools.
Welcome aboard. Comment below on what topics you would like to see addressed, and subscribe to be alerted to new posts.
Veritas,
Darren