• About
  • Blog Posts
  • Front Page
  • Greatest Hits

Apologetics4all – Dr. Williams' Religion Blog

~ Respectfully giving reasons for faith – 1 Peter 3:15

Apologetics4all – Dr. Williams' Religion Blog

Category Archives: C.S. Lewis

Enduring Wisdom of St. Clive

30 Tuesday Jul 2019

Posted by D. L. Williams in C.S. Lewis, Campus Apologetics, Philosophy

≈ 2 Comments

A Reblog of Drew Rick-Miller’s Science in Congregations email…

6c0bae4c-8971-4263-ad64-cded81147c02

A few years ago, when the bestselling author and New York Times columnist David Brooks found himself undone by a recent divorce, he began to contemplate a move spiritually and it became public. According to The New Yorker, “He received, by his own estimation, three hundred gifts of spiritual books, ‘only one hundred of which were different copies of C. S. Lewis’s Mere Christianity.’”

Undoubtedly this was about ninety-nine copies too many, but the friends and acquaintances were on to something. Lewis remains a potent force for instigating conversion. (It worked for me as a first-year student at Berkeley.) I have heard in countless lectures about Christian thought leaders who read “St. Clive” (my nickname—his full name is Clive Staples Lewis) and his enduring influence. I would say, with pardonable overstatement (I hope), that just about every Christian academic I know has read Lewis and been changed.

Lewis, Collins, and Oberg

But let me limit that comment above to thought leaders in faith and science. Francis Collins, the head of the National Institutes of Health, repeatedly cites Lewis as the reason he became a Christian in medical school at age 27. Alister McGrath has written several biographies of St. Clive and his enduring impact.

Continue reading…

How we come to change our minds

23 Sunday Jun 2019

Posted by D. L. Williams in C.S. Lewis, Campus Apologetics, Philosophy

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

epistemology, Jordan Peterson

TLDR: 1. How can we get an honest evaluation of our opinions (especially our opinions of ourselves)? 2. God the Holy Spirit enables us to view things (and ourselves) rightly.

Have you ever been wrong?

It is a legit question, because it is becoming extremely rare to hear someone admit, “I could be wrong, but here is what I think…”.

More and more people just spout declarative statements with no apparent consideration at all that they could possibly be wrong about something.

Slide2

Think about a time when you realized your belief was incorrect.

What did it feel like to realize you were mistaken?
[comment below]

How do we come to realize we have a mistaken belief? Is this an act of the will? How can it be? We are learning something that goes against our will.

What or who lets the contrary facts into our mind? I have seen that changes of mind are almost always unwanted.

The philosophy of ‘knowing’ is called epistemology.

definition of epistemology

The Stanford Encyclopedia has an excellent article on epistemology and defines Knowledge as “justified true belief”.

My use of the word “opinion” above is “belief” in their article. The various epistemologies outlined in the article center on the evaluation of the truthfulness and justifiedness of these beliefs.

Likewise, I have used a similar approach in my series of “No Such Thing as Blind Faith” posts.

But this post diverges from an analysis of epistemology and explores the phenomenon of opening your mind to the possibility that YOU might be mistaken. That your belief might be false in actuality.

You might be familiar with prominent skeptics like Peter Boghossian who use epistemology to argue against religious belief. I’m arguing that epistemology cuts both ways. And I’d like you to explore how it feels to change your mind.

It is built into the Christian world view that the reliability of our faculties is compromised.

I believe the Bible contains a few exceptions. This is controversial, so those with opposing viewpoints, I welcome your dialog in the comments. 

My church body teaches total depravity not just of behavior but also of our perceptual faculties. Because of this, many of my friends take a presuppositional approach to apologetics, claiming that “there really are no atheists” but only those who “suppress the truth in unrighteousness” (Romans 1:18 and 21).

I believe in total depravity, but I propose that the depravity exists not in our perceptions, but in our depraved desire to act on the truth of our perceptions. We may discover a true belief about the world or ourselves, but we are unable to fully bring our behavior or our beliefs in line with that truth. More on this later.

The support for the truthfulness of our perceptions comes in the very next verse in Romans.

19 For what can be known about God is plain to them [mankind], because God has shown it to them. 20 For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. [Romans 1:19-20 ESV, emphasis added]

With the above I wish to emphasize that clear perception of the world around us is a gift of God. He is showing us that we can rely to some degree on our senses to form Justified True Beliefs (Knowledge) about the “things that have been made”.

Back to the feeling of being wrong and changing one’s mind.

That strange and externally-powered “uh-oh” feeling should become more and more familiar to us as we age.

Slide5

I like the word conviction for these discovered truths. A conviction is imposed upon the convict. It is an externally-sourced internal judgement that one cannot help but act upon. Your convictions become your world view, and they are very difficult (often painful) to change.

One of the deepest convictions that is stubbornly difficult to change is the conviction:

“I am basically a good guy. Sure I make mistakes, but who doesn’t. We are all deep down inherently good and don’t really deserve punishment for the wrongs we have done. I mean, there are always external causes for the bad we have done. Right?”

Sorry to knock you off your horse, but you might be wrong about that.

Slide6

10 as it is written: “None is righteous, no, not one; 11 no one understands; no one seeks for God. 12 All have turned aside; together they have become worthless; no one does good, not even one.” [Romans 3:10-12 ESV]

Whoa! That’s tough to accept!

But is it? Forget about everyone else. Ask YOURSELF if YOU are righteous. Do YOU understand? Do YOU seek God? or have YOU turned aside? Do YOU always do good?

The Law

“Be perfect as your heavenly Father is perfect.” Jesus in Matthew 5:48

Do you feel that familiar irritating tension? Namely, “I may be wrong about being a good person”.

Perhaps, you are distressed by the Law, “Be perfect as your heavenly Father is perfect.” Good. You should be distressed by the Law.

That is a major mistake people (you?) make about Christianity. It is not a moral code. It does not teach that you can work your way to God.

There is no way to be perfect if we are fallen.

Good News

Christians talk incessantly about the Gospel (which means good news). Or, at least they should be talking incessantly about it.

What is the good news? Jesus fixed this impossible situation.

“If you would be perfect,… come, follow me.” Jesus in Matthew 19:21

Bold claim. And an evil claim if Jesus was a mere mortal man.

I don’t want you to mistake the purpose of this post. I’m not asking at this point for you to “trust Jesus”, believe the Gospel, etc. Although if you did, I’d be thrilled.

I am asking you merely to consider the possibility that you might be mistaken about what you believe.

Just crack the door on your heart. If there’s light out there it will come in. If not, it won’t.

I believe there is light on the outside of your dark heart.

The Holy Spirit’s Role

Jesus, when he was wrapping up his ministry with his disciples discussed what would happen next. He knew he was going to die, rise, and then go away (ascend) to Heaven. He shared that he would send the Holy Spirit back for a very specific purpose:

7 …I will send him [the Holy Spirit] to you. 8 And when he comes, he will convict the world concerning sin and righteousness and judgment” [John 16:7-8 ESV emphasis added]

Once again, we see an external source for our Justified True Beliefs (Knowledge). Only this time it is not merely beliefs about the external world. This counselor will convict us regarding our distorted self-esteem. We will be given new convictions externally applied that tell us we are broken and in need of fixing.

That’s why I am focusing on this feeling that we might be wrong about our deepest beliefs.

If you feel like you might be wrong about YOUR view of your own goodness, this is God speaking to you. Let that light in, even if it hurts.

Slide8

C. S. Lewis relentlessly resisted admitting that he was wrong. But as with all externally-imposed realizations, the fact that he was wrong was involuntary. It was a conviction. It was light that burned his heart and began to soften it. It was a gift of God.

This is a reliable progression.

There are three uses of the Law:

  1. Curb
  2. Mirror
  3. Guide

We are all familiar of the law behaving as a curb. These are the “don’t’s”. And unfortunately, most people stop there. They think that this sums up all of Christianity. “Don’t do this. Don’t do that. Don’t have any fun! If it tastes good, spit it out!” (Oh, that last one was not Christianity; that was my doctor.)

But the second use of the law is how the Holy Spirit breaks into our lives, uninvited.

The Mirror is God’s gift of self-awareness.

self awareness is a gift

The Mirror of the Law says you are “not good”. We hate this, naturally. But we also know this to be true because of the Spirit of God working in our very own consciences.

Why!?!

The spirit’s desire is to bring us to the foot of the cross, with an attitude like David in Psalm 32.

i confessed my sin

And Paul in Romans 7 “Who will save me from this body of death? Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord!”

The curb leads us to the mirror. The mirror leads us to the Cross. And God the Father sees us through the window of the Cross. Our imperfections do not get though because of Jesus role in cleansing us from all unrighteousness. We are made perfect in God’s eyes because he sees Jesus’ holiness when he looks at us.

Slide23

18 “Come now, let us reason together, says the LORD: though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red like crimson, they shall become like wool. [Isaiah 1:18 ESV]

Who Knows!?

Jordan Peterson understands the curb and the mirror very well. This is painfully clear in his latest video where he wrestles with the question, “Do you, Jordan, believe in God?”

Slide22

Like Jacob, wrestling with God, Jordan wrestles with all he has. He’s familiar with the mirror that tells him he falls desperately short. And he is left dumbfounded at the audacity of one claiming to believe in God.

But there is one more piece to the puzzle that I wish desperately for him to discover. He says we can’t know because we are separated from eternity by the veil of death. WHO KNOWS?! he asks.

THAT is why Jesus came, why he died, and why he rose.

Jesus knows.

He is not just a moral teacher. He is the champion over death and can heal our epistemic blindness.

Jesus pleads, “28 Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. 29 Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me, for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. 30 For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.” [Matthew 11:28-30 ESV]

I have great respect for Jordan Peterson. If you know him, please pass this along.

Thank you,

Darren

P.S. The Guide use of the Law turns the law into a positive tool for action. The Curb says, “do not lie”, and the Guide says, “tell the truth”.

No Blind Faith – Part 1

07 Sunday Apr 2019

Posted by D. L. Williams in C.S. Lewis, Campus Apologetics, Church, Philosophy, Ratio Christi

≈ 1 Comment

Central Thesis:

No one can actually believe in something blindly.

What is the concept meant by the term Christian “Faith”?

“Faith is believing what you know aint so.” – Mark Twain

“Faith is believing in spite of the evidence.” – Christopher Hitchens

“Believe me when I say that I am in the Father and the Father is in me; or at least believe on the evidence of the works themselves.” – Jesus of Nazareth

“Faith is being sure of what you hope for and certain of what you do not see.” – The writer of Hebrews (Chapter 11, verse 7)

We can dispense with the incorrect characterizations of Hitchens, Dawkins, Twain, et al completely by simply pointing out that their understanding of Christian faith is incorrect.  In fact, if they were accurately describing Christian faith as “believing in spite of the evidence”, then they would also be accurate in stating that Christianity is dangerous and tantamount to child abuse.  But they do not understand what the word “faith” means in a Christian and Biblical context.  Do you?

Blind_Faith_

This series of blog posts will explore what is (or at least should be) meant by Christians when they say they have “faith” in Christ.  This will serve dual purposes of causing the Christian to seriously consider HOW they themselves came to faith, and of providing a starting point for discussion with non-believers about the word “faith” in a Christian world view.

This series will explore the following:

  • Part 1 – Introduction to my “No Such Thing as Blind Faith” series of posts
  • Part 2 – What is the Biblical concept of the word “faith”?
  • How does one come to have “faith” in something?
    • Part 3 – Sources they trust – parents, pastors, professors, publications, papers, posts
    • Part 4 – Intuition – putting the pieces of life together (least “explainable” but still not “blind”)
    • Part 5 – Reaction to stress or joy – mountain tops and valleys in life
    • Part 6 – Experience – direct experience with Christ in some way
  • Part 7 – Conclusion, support of the central thesis, and how we come to change our minds

The bottom line

Many people shy away from apologetic study because the focus is on historical reliability, logical progression, reading, reading, and more reading.  They may incorrectly say, “I just believe” or even “I just have blind faith”, meaning (perhaps) that “I haven’t read all those books, but I have received comfort from Christ” (experience).  Or “I have seen Christ change my (child, father, mother, wife, husband, brother, sister), and can see that it is true” (sources). Or “I cannot explain how mankind (myself included) can be so evil without acknowledging sin, and Christ’s atonement lines up with this” (intuition). Or “I’m so wracked with grief; God help me!”  “I can’t contain my JOY! Praise God” (reaction). Or “God was there in my grief.  God was there in my joy!” (experience)  These are not as rigorously literary as a historical treatise on the evidence for the resurrection, but they are clearly not “blind“.  In one way or another, they are “evidence”.

There are separate posts on each of the above topics.  In the end, the central thesis “that there is no way to actually believe in something blindly” is strongly supported.

:DW

Skrewtape’s stamp of approval

28 Friday Jul 2017

Posted by D. L. Williams in C.S. Lewis, Church, Liturgy, Worship

≈ 2 Comments

Imagine my horror, when I saw this on the dark web. It appears my post on worship has gone viral there after receiving the infamous Screwtape‘s personal stamp of approval.

At great personal risk, I have copied the text of Screwtape’s response to my post. I hope it will be beneficial to you. I know I learned a lot from reading it.

An image of my post on worship with Screwtape's stamp of approval

An image of my post on worship with Screwtape’s stamp of approval

To: My pathetic colleagues including the deficient Wormwood

From: the Inimitable Screwtape, Master of Daemons and Online Trolls

Another obscure post from another unknown blogger was brought to my attention. But it worries me slightly. Let’s use it as an example of how to avoid the good and focus on the bad. There is some risk associated with Mr. Darren’s self-righteous post, but I think we can manage it if we divert the discussions in the Parking Lot and bring in some resources from the Department of Discord.

Mister Darren starts off with some noxious clap trap about love, love, and more love. Do your best to divert anyone who happens along his blog post to skim over this part. Try to tease them into thinking this lovey talk is just the normal background noise of “churchiness” and not that he REALLY loves his church, his pastors (bleh I can hardly stand to type that word), or his youth. The word “love” stinks of the enemy, and real love is intolerable.

On to the juicy parts. I would have ignored this post altogether if Mr. Darren had not identified (accidentally, I’m sure because he doesn’t appear exceptionally bright) our two main techniques for deflating the power of worshipping the enemy – that is over emotionalism and under emotionalism. (Ugh! I hate admitting that anyone could actually worship … whatever!)

Cathartic excess and adrenaline has been one of our most effective weapons, and Mr. Darren has the gall to try to shine his little pen-light of a blog on our secret machinations. This has to be dealt with.

Likewise, he turns his little pitiful blog towards our bulwark of the disconnected recitation of mumblings that the enemy’s minions call the liturgy. He rightly points out that the words in those liturgical writings are noxious to us and are focused on the enemy.

But I’m not worried about the words in their liturgy or the words in their noxious praise songs. We have human nature on our side. And that is where I would like you to focus your efforts.

I am assigning Wormwood to lead this task. Hopefully, he won’t foul this one up.

Here is the plan.

If by chance someone stumbled upon Mr. Darren’s insignificant and pitiful blog, it is ok to let them read it. After they read it begin your work, thusly. Put the following questions into their ever-so-distractable minds:

  1. How many minutes are dedicated in a so-called worship service to their favorite categories: Contemporary vs Traditional vs Liturgical
  2. Did the worship committee pick EXACTLY the same number of contemporary songs vs old songs.
  3. Why is (organ, guitar, saxophone, trumpet, piano, drums) being used? NEVER let them listen unimpeded to the beauty of any musical offering! That beauty (bleh) is from the enemy and is very dangerous to us. Instead, get them to focus on every little missed note, off pitch, etc. These people are pretty pathetic so it is always easy to find distracting bits in the mix.
  4. Why is the pastor using that story, telling that joke, behaving that way, choosing that verse? This overly critical attitude of the “laypeople” is a new tool for us, and it is bearing some excellent fruit. Do your best to eliminate any respect of the pastors because they serve the enemy full time. There’s no telling what those fellas are up to. Especially dangerous to us are those pastors who pray together with each other and their leadership teams and who hold each other accountable. Our people cannot stand to be in the room when they are praying to the enemy, so we have difficulty knowing what they are planning.
  5. Why are we (or aren’t we) offering two worship services? We can operate effectively against the enemy in either of these situations so no matter what they choose to do, we can still distract the members to be bothered by the situation.

The one thing we CANNOT allow under any circumstances, and that is to allow the members of Faith Lutheran Church or any other church to ACTUALLY worship the enemy.

Although I couldn’t bear to read all the writings and analysis Mr. Darren pulled from the so called “holy” writings, I do know he got dangerously close to equating worship with selflessness and sacrifice. This is a very delicate situation, but Mr. Darren has given you the key to distracting a devout worshiper. Notice his martyrial tone. “I will be the one to sacrifice MY desires.” Oh brother! Take this over-dramatic selflessness and insert our secret sauce – pride.

If you can have the devout worshipers become proud of their devotion, then we can derail the whole enterprise.

That’s enough for now.

Don’t mess it up!

-Screwtape

Alert All C.S. Lewis Fans

05 Wednesday Aug 2015

Posted by D. L. Williams in Biography, C.S. Lewis, Literature, Podcasts

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Biography, C.S. Lewis, Christian Apologetics, Literature, Podcasts

The_Lamb_and_Flag,_St_Giles_-_geograph.org.uk_-_719516

You know C. S. Lewis

  • Christian apologist and explainer of the faith
  • Member of the Inklings using artistic literature in God’s service
  • Historical mentor of mine and yours

I encourage you to feast upon this collection of interview podcasts from the Eric Mataxas Show. Eric Mataxas is author of Amazing Grace, Bonhoeffer, and Miracles. Eric also created Socrates in the City, which is the venue for these interviews that took place in Oxford, England.

The interviews were of Walter Hooper – C. S. Lewis’s personal secretary and manager of Lewis’s papers after his death. He shares some fascinating stories about our favorite mentor in the faith.

Please enjoy, and go subscribe to the Eric Mataxas Show for more of the same. (No commission is involved, unfortunately. 🙂 )

Hour 1

Hour 2

Hour 3

Hour 4

I cannot add much. Some of my favorite moments in these interviews made me laugh and a few made me choke up with a tear or two.

I laughed when Walter cautioned Jack about giving money to a beggar outside the pub.

Hooper: “Aren’t you afraid that this man will spend that money on drink?”

Lewis: “Well if I kept it, I would.”

A tear welled up when I heard the Pope’s compliment of Lewis.

He knew his Apostolate; and he DID it.

It surprised me that I reacted this way. But this is a hint of what we hope to hear from God in the end,

Well done, my good and faithful servant.

May we all find our apostolate and DO it with God’s help.

DLW

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • April 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • May 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • August 2015
  • February 2015
  • September 2014
  • August 2014

Categories

  • Biography
  • C.S. Lewis
  • Campus Apologetics
  • Church
  • Education
  • Grief, Death, and Dying
  • Historiography
  • Literature
  • Liturgy
  • Philosophy
  • Podcasts
  • Prayer
  • Ratio Christi
  • Reality Blog
  • Sexual Ethics
  • Uncategorized
  • Worship

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • Apologetics4all - Dr. Williams' Religion Blog
    • Join 25 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Apologetics4all - Dr. Williams' Religion Blog
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...