• About
  • Blog Posts
  • Front Page
  • Greatest Hits

Apologetics4all – Dr. Williams' Religion Blog

~ Respectfully giving reasons for faith – 1 Peter 3:15

Apologetics4all – Dr. Williams' Religion Blog

Tag Archives: canon

NIST Traceability

18 Thursday Sep 2014

Posted by D. L. Williams in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

canon, new testament, nist traceability

What’s the right answer? Every student worth their salt at some point asks this question when making lab measurements. Often in the teaching labs we engineer the results by giving them an “unknown” to analyze. But the professor has the certificate of analysis from the company that sold the unknowns.

But how do we come to have confidence in this certificate of analysis? Sometimes the certificate has the designation of “NIST Traceable“, which for chemical analysis is something of a gold standard. What goes into this confidence?

Traceability relies on several things – library standards, trained personnel, and calibrated instrumentation. Each of these criteria have their own rigorous vetting process, because nature does not ever explicitly tell you the right answer. In the end, self-consistency is in play. This process serves as canon, rule, or law for chemical analyses.

There are chemists who spend their careers improving this traceability vetting process, and some of my own research has been dedicated to creating physical standard reference objects for calibrating contact angle measurement devices and instrumentation.

Interestingly, I see the same process at work in analyzing the canon, rule, and law of the Bible. There is a great iPad app from Doug Powell on the traceability of the New Testament. This post image is from that app from selflessdefense.com.

In this app Doug lays out the criteria used by the church to recognize traceability. They are:

  1. Apostolic Authority and Apostolic Age – The book should be written by an apostle (i.e. Matthew or John) or by a close companion of the apostle (i.e. Mark and Luke) who accurately recorded his teaching. Also, the book had to be written while the apostles were still alive so that the apostles could correct or oppose a false recording. This is analogous to the Control Chart in instrumental terms. There must be a seamless record of reliable behavior for confidence to be preserved.
  2. No book could contradict the teachings of the apostles. The teachings of Christ and the power he bestowed upon the apostles through the Holy Spirit at Pentacost is the “standard reference” to use NIST terms. This testimony is the “accepted true value”.
  3. Finally, the book had to be accepted by most of the churches and in continuous use as Holy Scripture for worship since the apostolic period. This is analogous to the “Round Robin” trials of standard development. Several reliable and qualified labs will analyze the standard. If all or most of the labs agree, there is confidence in the consistent results obtained by different analysts in different locations.

This seems to be a reasonable approach, but it is not without controversy. Dan Brown (in fictional Da Vinci code) and others (like Bart Ehrman) have claimed that the Canon was created as a power play of Constantine or that the deity of Jesus was a late invention. But even a tip-toe into the historical record falsifies these claims.

For more detail, I highly recommend Doug’s apps and books. A second and more forensic treatment of this topic is given in J. Warner Wallace’s book Cold Case Christianity in the chapter where he discusses the Chain of Custody of the story of Jesus of Nazareth.

I hope you will dig into these resources. It is my birthday, today, and I give this gift to you. Don’t leave it unopened.

DLW

IMG_0445-3.PNG

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • April 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • May 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • August 2015
  • February 2015
  • September 2014
  • August 2014

Categories

  • Biography
  • C.S. Lewis
  • Campus Apologetics
  • Church
  • Education
  • Grief, Death, and Dying
  • Historiography
  • Literature
  • Liturgy
  • Philosophy
  • Podcasts
  • Prayer
  • Ratio Christi
  • Reality Blog
  • Sexual Ethics
  • Uncategorized
  • Worship

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy